
Alert:
Gilchrist County Commission Meeting
Tuesday
September 30, 2008, at 6 PM
at Trenton High School Auditorium
Trenton, Florida
1013 North Main
Street
Our Santa Fe River, Inc. has been sharing information with you for nearly
a year regarding 4 more water bottling facilities coming to the Santa Fe River
within a 3-mile stretch of riverfront. They could withdraw a combined total
(with the one already operating, CCDA or Coca-Cola/Danone), of 1.3 billion
gallons yearly. We were including
you with all this info, so that when the time came you would be ready to come to
government meetings and voice your concerns, or simply come as a warm body in
protest of this outrageous business… the business of bottling your public
natural resource, WATER, for huge corporate profits.
WE NEED YOUR
HELP now to show your support for the health
of the river, springs and aquifer.
Voice your opinion on the future of water use. Let your public officials know how you
feel about this type of business depleting more water than any one of our
towns use in one year. We
urge you to mark your calendar, save the date, and be there to make your
statement a part of our history.
Our Santa Fe River, Inc.
1-386-454-2366
www.oursantaferiver.org
***************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Background:
Suwannee River Water Management District issued a water use permit to Blue Springs Properties in 1997, and then again in 2003. They revoked it during 2007, because of lack of follow through. In a letter dated August 13, 2007, Suwannee River Water Management had requested Blue Springs to supply them with one or more of the following examples, but not limited to in order to fulfill their permit requirements:
“an agreement with a vendor with specific dates,
a county-approved detailed site plan and approved zoning conformance,
letter from the county with specific dates,
a detailed business plans with specific dates,
evidence of construction.”
After the revocation, Blue Springs requested an Administrative Hearing (a private meeting with SRWMD) to ask for a continuance as to supply the District with the above mentioned request of information.
In 2003,
Blue Springs attempted to persuade Gilchrist County Commissioners to change
their 31 acres from Agriculture (Ag-2) to light industrial use. Gilchrist County
refused the change of land use zoning then. Now, Blue Springs Properties wants
Gilchrist County Comm. to allow for a “Special Use Permit” on their Ag-2 land to
build a plant.
During the Gilchrist County Planning and Zoning meeting on March 17, 2008 the P&Z Board unanimously voted against the "Special Use Permit" to build a facility. Over 200 citizens attended this meeting and over 50 voiced their concerns during the meeting.
Blue Springs Properties had another Administrative Hearing with the SRWMD around the time of the Planning and Zoning meeting in March 2008. At this time the district reduced Blue's allocation to 500,000 gallons daily versus 528,000 they were permitted. (They are still permitted a maximum allocation of 660,000 gallons daily). They also reduced their campground water use permit from 32,000 gallons to 16,000 gallons daily. OSFR requested to be present during this meeting with the District, but we were told it was a "private" meeting between the two parties...Blue Springs Properties and the SRWMD... and their lawyers. So we are not certain why they reduced the allocation. During this meeting the two parties agreed that the entire 5 member board of the County Commission must be present to vote on this issue.
NOW...they are all present. You can find their names and addresses below. We encourage you to write to your elected officials and tell them how you feel about these kinds of businesses in your neighborhoods. It does not matter what county you live in. ALTHOUGH, they really want to hear from the residents of Gilchrist County. But we will all be affected in our quality of life. The rivers and roads join us all together and we must preserve them for our future generations.
Now the County Commission
must hear the request through due process and
vote to decide the fate of our aquifer, springs and river and or way of
life.
Talking
Points:
1. The Santa Fe River System is designated by the state
of Florida as an Outstanding Florida Waterway.
“Outstanding
Florida Waters are rivers, lakes and other bodies of water designated by the
Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), under authority of Section 403.061
(27), Florida Statutes, as worthy of special protection because of their natural
attributes. Outstanding Florida Waters have special restrictions on any new
activities that would lower water quality or otherwise degrade the body of
water.” Wikipedia
2. The
water, when bottled in plastic containers (derived from oil), would be
transported in large trucks outside this area for corporate profit. Each 16 oz.
plastic bottle requires ¼ of its size in oil during manufacture and shipping.
3. CCDA
(Coca-Cola/Danone) is less than a mile from Blue on CR 340.
CCDA is already permitted to extract up to 1,728,000 gallons daily from
the aquifer.
4. Key words: concurrency and safety. Traffic would increase with an additional 272 truck trips per day and employee vehicles, right next to the bicycle path and on a school bus route. CR 340 already bears additional vehicular traffic, as the area has been popular for suburban and rural residential development, it is a growth corridor for future development and it is used by thousands of tourists every week that frequent Poe Springs, Blue Springs, Ginnie Springs and Rock Bluff on the Suwannee River. This type of traffic will also be using the Main Streets of High Springs and Ft. White to get to Interstate 75, miles away.
5. We were recently in a legally designated water
use restriction period. Restrictions are to be enforced by the local
municipalities, Gilchrist County in this case. Reducing water availability from
our public natural resources, during times of drought, is particularly poor
management. Many residential wells were compromised, and more will become
dry if drought continues...as
predicted.
6.
There are vacant factory jobs available in Bell, High Springs and Alachua,
a few miles away.
7. Bottled
Water Plants generate noise and light pollution which is not compatible with
rural residential development and recreational land
uses.
**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
|
|
|
Planning
Director
Division of Planning and
Development
Taylor Brown
209 SE 1st St.
Trenton, FL
32693
352-463-3173
Secretary
Planning &
Development Department
209 SE First St.
Trenton, FL
32693
352-463-3127 Office
Alan Mikell
1500 SW 105th St.
Trenton, FL 32693
Johnnie Martin
6849 SW CR 341
Trenton, FL 32693
Michelle Crawford
3829 S. U.S. Hwy 129
Bell, FL 32619
Roosevelt Stalvey
889 SE SR 47
Trenton, FL 32693
Tammy Davis
P.O. Box 1182
Trenton, FL 32693
County Administrator and
Ron McQueen
209 SE 1st St.
Trenton, FL
32693
352-463-3198
Office of the County
Administration
Julee Brideson
209 SE 1st St.
Trenton, FL 32693
352-463-3198
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bottled Water
Free Zones Campaign: New tools and resources!
Dear water
activists,
New tools and resources are now
available on the Inside the Bottle website,
under the ‘Campaign Tools’
sidebar. They include:
·
Bottled Water
Fact Sheets: Environmental, health, social and
economic impacts of the bottled water industry
·
Bottled Water
FAQ: Frequently asked questions about
policies phasing out bottled water
·
Take the
Plunge: Action options for municipal
governments around bottled water
·
How to organize Bottled Water Free Events on
Campus
·
FOI Request
Template: Accessing your university’s
beverage exclusivity contract
Let’s continue to take action on the
bottled water industry, and call for the re-building and maintenance of public
tap water systems and infrastructure.
For more information,
contact:
Joe Cressy, Campaigns
Coordinator
joecressy@polarisinstitute.org
Zoe Maggio, Water
Campaigner
Take Action! Check out Inside the Bottle campaign actions here!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Century Commission's Water Policy Congress
September 25 - 26, Orlando
This story is about the UF Water Institute and St. Johns River Water Management meeting that took place last week in Gainesville, FL at the Hilton.
Search results for: "Consensus Inches Toward Two Nearby Rivers" | ||
|
|
Results 1 - 1 of 1 for
Consensus Inches Toward Two Nearby Rivers
| |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
![]() |
|
Take
the Water Quality
|
For as long as we’ve been protecting working farms and
ranches, American Farmland Trust has been equally focused on environmental
conservation on those lands. Now, with new opportunities for agriculture to help
solve the nation’s toughest environmental challenges, we’re initiating important
programs across the country. Water Quality Trading is a cost-effective and
innovative way to clean up waterways while offering farmers a key role in
ensuring safe drinking water. Take our three-part tutorial to find out how these
programs work. If you get stuck along the way, be sure to check out our Water
Quality Trading Glossary of Terms.
Lesson One:
What Is Water Quality Trading?
Lesson Two:
How Do Water Quality Trading Programs Work?
Lesson
Three: Why Are these Programs Important?
The first vote was for a moratorium against any and all attempts or acceptance
of an application to conduct large scale water extraction until a strong water
ordinance, approved by the residents, was in place that would protect the town,
its water and its residents. The vote was 204 YES in favor, 38 NO, against the
moratorium (84% Yes). The Moratorium lasts six months and can be renewed
for another six months.
The effort by local citizens to resist the plan to extract water started in
middle to late March by three people, then expanded to the current sixteen
members, with help from additional volunteers. Nestle spent, according to
calculations based on advertising space (black and white and multi-colored)
almost $45,000, and the POWWR spent less than $3,000. Nestle sent a first
class letter to every resident of the town, sent teams of Nestle persons door to
door in groups of two, showered the town with flyers, hired two additional
attorneys, hired a geologist to assist with various informational duties,
employed two other geologists to walk on nearby State land that would be
affected by water extraction, as well as other activities by two of the three
selectpersons that suggested they would welcome Nestle. Our group used
door to door efforts, one mailing, informational meetings, personal
conversations, flyers, signs, and the like to inform citizens of the truth about
Nestle.
This is not the termination of the work against Nestle. Other activity
will be related to whether the town can prepare a suitable ordinance. Town
officials had every opportunity to prepare an ordinance; they were given on two
occasions one that would serve their town, but they chose to not use it. They
were even offered, but declined, help to write it.
Our members appreciate the support and encouragement given to us by nearby
groups who are also working against Nestle. We also thank those from greater
distances who sent their good wishes to us on numerous occasions. In a
similar way, we extend our encouragement to all of you who know, just as we know
at this moment, that a small group of people can stand up to a powerful
international corporation and can effect, in one way or another, the outcome of
a Nestle “surge.” It also demonstrates that citizens, when given accurate
data and the truth about massive-scale water removal and the massive-scale
extractors, can carefully weigh and select the best approach to protect their
natural resources.
September 20, 2008
POWWR
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Fern Marcya Edison
Ericho Communications; 845-679-6319