
Contains Flood Information......
SRWMD Efforts in
Response to Tropical Storm Fay
LIVE OAK, FL, Au. 22,
2008—In response to Tropical Storm Fay,
the Susanne River Water Management District (District) wants to inform the
public of its efforts in support of flood control operations and ongoing
mitigation efforts to help minimize negative
impacts.
Citizens can continuously check
real-time rainfall data, surface water levels and flood prediction information
by visiting the District’s website at www.mysuwanneeriver.com. In
preparation for major storms, a link is posted on the homepage to take readers
directly to the flood information page, which also has links to other helpful
sites such as the National Weather Service and Florida Division of Emergency
Management.
River level information can also be
accessed 24 hours a day by calling the District’s automated phone line at
386.362.6626 or 800.604.2272.
The District has an active program
of local government assistance in which funds and expertise are provided in
establishing stormwater utilities and surface water system retrofits and
improvements. The District is also a cooperative technical partner with the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and is working to assist in
digitizing and updating flood insurance rate maps throughout the water
management district.
The District has acquired
approximately 350 miles of river frontage as part of its Land Acquisition and
Management plan that keeps development out of harms way. A non-structural
approach to floodplain management is currently in place, and there are no
canals, dikes, dams or levees to maintain and no structures to either contain or
release water. However, the District takes a proactive regulatory approach that
requires dwellings and other buildings be set back 75 feet from the river bank
and have a one foot vertical freeboard above the one percent recurrence interval
elevation.
In response to the effects of
Hurricanes Charlie, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne in 2004, the District was
successful in obtaining a grant from the Natural Resource Conservation Service
and installed over $1 million worth of local drainage structure improvements.
District staff work in the field
during and subsequent to extreme rainfall events to gather data, document water
levels and assess flood damages. These and other proactive measures serve to
keep the public informed and aware during major storms and other times of
uncertainty.
Other agencies also provide
important information during times of flood. For boating advisories including
idle speed and no wake zones contact the
###
Holly
Stalvey
Communication
Coordinator
Suwannee
River Water Management District
9225
CR 49
(386)
362-1001
Fax:
(386) 362-1056
Toll
free: 800-226-1066 (FL only)
Bottling Plan Pushes Groundwater to Center Stage in Vermont | Gainesville.com | The Gainesville Sun | Gainesville, FLþ
The following notice has been published to Florida
Administrative Weekly today, August 22, 2008. https://www.flrules.org/default.asp
The link to a summary of the FAW notice is
https://www.flrules.org/Gateway/View_notice.asp?id=6034872
The FAW notice (as shown below) can be found at: https://www.flrules.org/gateway/RuleNo.asp?id=62-304.410
The current Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report can
be found at: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/tmdl/draft_tmdl.htm#Group1
For more information about the TMDL, please contact Jan
Mandrup-Poulsen at Jan.Mandrup-Poulsen@dep.state.fl.us
For more information, please contact the Suwannee Basin
Coordinator, Terry Hansen at Terry.Hansen@dep.state.fl.us
Notice of Proposed
Rule
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
RULE NO: RULE TITLE
62-304.410:
PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The purpose of the rule
is to adopt Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), and their allocations, for
nutrients and dissolved oxygen in the Santa Fe River (below river rise) and to
adopt Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), and their allocations, for fecal
coliforms (New River), total nitrogen (New River WBIDs 3506 and 3506B), and
total phosphorus (New River WBID 3506).
SUMMARY: The Santa Fe TMDL addresses
nutrients and dissolved oxygen impairments in the
SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED
REGULATORY COSTS: The Department has not prepared a Statement of Estimated
Regulatory Cost (SERC) for this proposed Rule.
Any person who wishes to
provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or
provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing
within 21 days of this notice.
SPECIFIC AUTHORITY: 403.061, 403.067 FS.
LAW IMPLEMENTED: 403.061, 403.062, 403.067 FS.
A HEARING WILL BE HELD AT THE DATE, TIME AND
PLACE SHOWN BELOW:
DATE AND TIME: September 18, 2008,
9:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
PLACE: Florida Department of
Environmental Protection,
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring special accommodations to
participate in this workshop/meeting is asked to advise the agency at least 5
days before the workshop/meeting by contacting: Ms. Pat Waters at (850)245-8449.
If you are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the agency using the
Florida Relay Service, 1(800)955-8771 (TDD) or 1(800)955-8770 (Voice).
THE
PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Jan Mandrup-Poulsen,
Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration, Bureau of Watershed
Management, Mail Station 3555, Florida Department of Environmental Protection,
2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400, telephone
(850)245-8448
THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:
62-304.410
(1)
(a) Santa Fe River TMDL for nutrient
and dissolved oxygen impairments: The Total Maximum Daily Load for nutrients in
the Santa Fe River (below river rise) is to achieve a monthly average of 0.35
mg/L nitrate-N, and is allocated as follows:
1. The Wasteload Allocation (WLA) for
wastewater sources is not applicable,
2. The WLA for discharges subject to
the Department’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Municipal Stormwater Permitting Program are to meet a monthly average in-stream
ambient water quality target of 0.35 mg/L nitrate-N. The range of percent
reduction necessary to achieve the LA is estimated between 13 and 35 percent
depending on the month and location within the basin..Achievement of the TMDL
constitutes meeting the water quality target,
and
3. The Load Allocations (LA) for
nonpoint sources are to meet a monthly average of 0.35 mg/L nitrate-N. The range
of percent reduction necessary to achieve the LA is estimated between 13 and 35
percent depending on the month and location within the basin. Achievement of the
TMDL constitutes meeting the water quality target,
and
4. The Margin of Safety is
implicit.
(2)
(a) New River TMDL for fecal coliform
impairment. The Total Maximum Daily Load for
1. The WLA for wastewater point
sources is not applicable,
2. The WLA for discharges subject to
the Department’s NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permitting Program is not
applicable,
3. The LA for nonpoint sources is to
address anthropogenic sources in the basin such that in-stream concentrations
meet the fecal coliform criteria which, based on the measured concentrations
from the 1995 to 2007 period, will require a 45 percent reduction at sources
contributing to exceedances of the criteria,
and
4. The Margin of Safety is
implicit.
5. While the LA for fecal coliform
has been expressed as the percent reductions needed to attain the applicable
Class III criteria, it is not the intent of the TMDL to abate natural background
conditions.
(b) New River TMDL for dissolved
oxygen impairment. The Total Maximum Daily Load for the
1. The WLA for wastewater point
sources is not applicable,
2. The WLA for discharges subject to
the Department’s NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permitting Program is not
applicable,
3. The LA for nonpoint sources is to
address anthropogenic sources in the basin such that there is a 38 percent
reduction of current anthropogenic total nitrogen (TN) loading to the upper
portion of the New River, a 13 percent reduction of current anthropogenic total
nitrogen (TN) loading to the lower portion of the New River, and a 38 percent
reduction of current anthropogenic total phosphorus (TP) loading to the lower
portion of the New River, based on measured concentrations from the 1995 to 2006
period.
Specific Authority
403.061, 403.067 FS. Law Implemented 403.061, 403.062, 403.067 FS.
History–New
.
NAME OF PERSON
ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Drew Bartlett, Deputy Director, Division of
Environmental Assessment and Restoration
NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE
PROPOSED RULE: Michael Sole, Secretary, Department of Environmental
Protection
DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: July 29, 2008
DATE
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE DEVELOPMENT PUBLISHED IN FAW: August 1,
2008
Anita
Nash
Environmental
Consultant
Watershed
Planning and Coordination Section
Watershed
Management Program
Office:
(850) 245-8545
Fax:
(850 245-8434
Florida
Department of Environmental Protection
Bob
![]() | ||
| ||
GILCHRIST COUNTY ANNOUNCEMENT....
FYI: The Gilchrist County
Visioning Committee will be meeting on the following
dates:
Tuesday,
September 2, 2008, 6:00 P.M.
Tuesday, October
7, 2008
Thursday,
November 6, 2008
Tuesday, December
2, 2008
All meetings will be held at the
Trenton High School Auditorium (
The meetings are
open to the public, and everyone in the
Please help spread the
word!
Thank
you.
Gilchrist County Community
Development Department
Phone (352)
463-3173
Fax (352)
463-3189
Email: tbrown@gilchrist.fl.us
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Interesting chemical questions directed to Niagara Bottling LLC.
These are questions we need to be concerned within our neighborhoods too.
August 20, 2008
To: Rob Kelly
From: Ronald E. Ney, Jr., Ph.D.
Subject: Consumptive use application by Niagara Bottling LLC
There are many l concerns that I have concerning Niagara Bottling LLC, bottling plant that I wished SJRWMD and Niagara Bottling LLC would answers.
· Will plastic particles be discharged?
· Will the plastic particles absorb or adsorb any chemicals, if so, which ones and how much?
· Will the nano-plastic particles absorb or adsorb any chemicals, if so, which ones and how much?
· What chemicals will be in the wastewater and solid waste and how much?
· What chemical extraction and determinative methods are used?
· How where the methods validated and who did the peer review of the methods?
· Will phthalates be discharged?
5. The following question concern discharges into the air.
· What chemicals will be discharged?
· Will plastic particles and or nano-particles be discharged?
· Will phthalates be discharged?
6. Are sanitizers and chlorinated chemicals used and discharged?
7. What chemicals and what amounts will be stored on the site?
8. Will any Laws and Treaties of the United States for Protecting Migratory Birds similar to those listed below be violated or any others?
9. Will any international treaties not listed in 8 be violated because of the contaminated discharge or its reuse on land? If requested I can provide additional list.
10. The following questions deal with the statement, “A report that Niagara prepared for the water management district predicts the company's water withdrawal could lower some lakes in that part of the county by more than an inch.”
· What predictive techniques were used?
· I would like a copy of these predictive techniques.
· What is the accuracy of the predictive techniques?
· How were the predictive methods validated?
· Who peered reviewed the predictive techniques?
· What comments did the peer reviewers rendered on the predictive techniques?
Thank you,
Dr. Ron Ney
Ø Certificate of Achievement and entered into the 16th edition of AMERICAN MEN AND WOMEN OF SCIENCE, January 1987.
Ø In 1994-1995, included in Marquis WHO'S WHO IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, Marquis WHO'S WHO in America.
Ø In 1997, included in the International Who's Who, Cambridge England
Retired Supervisory Chemist USEPA (USDA & FDA) and former NREP & Registered Environmental Professional State of California
I have reviewed and/or supervised the review of data on plants, animals, air, soil and water to make regulatory decisions and enforcement decisions (actions) and other type reviews.
1. I have reviewed about 10,000 pesticides labels for chemical names, crop restrictions, etc.
2. I have reviewed about 3,000 reports for pesticide petitions for tolerance (chemical residues in crops), rotational crops, planting restrictions, etc. I wrote many data requirements for this under FIFRA, which were adopted by FFDCA (pre USEPA).
4. I have reviewed about 500 reports for environmental chemistry data on fate and transport of pesticides in air, water, soil, plants and animals. These data requirements were written and started by me.
5. I have reviewed microbial studies proposed by NASA for research in space.
6. I have reviewed studies for the disposal of radioactive material at Yucca Mountain.
I have reviewed many pesticide studies on fate and transport submitted by the USACOE to USDA and USEPA.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Orlando Sentinel
Lake & Sumter in brief